Dziedzic v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co.

The evidence for the plaintiff is substantially the same as on the former transfer. The claim of the defendant that it produced a large amount of evidence tending to deny the plaintiff’s contentions (if well grounded) does not affect the result here. The question of the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence to take the case-to the jury was finally determined by the former decision. Derosier v. Company, ante, 405, and cases cited. Production of conflicting evidence merely presented additional matter for consideration by the jury-

Exceptions to the admission of evidence that ten years before…