Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1953No. 5-135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

The issue here is whether a vested or contingent remainder in certain land passed to Aubrey Boykin, now deceased, under the will of his grandmother, Alice E. Garnett, who died February 15, 1922.

Alice E. Garnett executed a will on January 5, 1921, in which she devised certain lands in the city of Hot Springs, Arkansas, to each, of her two sons and a daughter, Rita Boykin. The residue of her estate, except certain real estate located in Washington, D. C., was left to said three children equally in fee simple. Included in that residue was certain real estate in Hot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Deener v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Jenkins v. Packingtown Realty CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Greer v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Steele v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ragland v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Pullen v. Estate of PullenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API