Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. Coomes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 8, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

This habeas corpus proceeding was instituted by Dorothy Ann Coomes and her husband, William L. Coomes, to obtain the custody of Mrs. Coomes’ five and a half year old son, Eugene Crittenden. Since Eugene’s birth he has lived with his maternal grandparents, the appellants in this action. In a well reasoned opinion the lower court decided that Mrs. Coomes was entitled to the custody of her child. The appellants urge reversal on the grounds that contracts for custody of children are invalid and the court erred in fixing the burden of proof.

While Mrs. Coomes was single and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Thompson v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Horn v. DreschelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Vetter v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Fraze v. GrundyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgason v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  2. Bonilla v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API