Legal Opinion

Phenix Ins. v. Findley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Fremont District Oov/rb. Action against the sureties uj)on k bond given by an agent of plaintiff to secure the faithful performance of his duties. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff; defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The condition of the bond in suit is in the following language:

“The condition of this obligation is such that whereas the above named R. S. Carr has been appointed agent of the Phenix Insurance Company in the city of Hamburg, county of Fremont and State of Iowa, who will receive, as such agent, sums of money as premiums, payment of losses, salvages, collections or otherwise, for goods, chattels or other property for the said Phenix Insurance Company; and is to keep true and correct account of the same; pay over such money correctly; and make regular reports of the business transacted by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Home Insurance v. HolwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Crawford v. BergenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Weimer v. LueckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Hoyt v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Williams v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API