Legal Opinion
Adams v. C R Bard Incorporated
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 19, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00335Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ISAAC ADAMS, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:21-cv-00335-DAD-BAM C. R. BARD, INC. AND BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., Defendants. JOINT MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and (d), Plaintiffs in the above-titled action and Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, “Bard”) (Plaintiffs and Bard are collectively referred to herein as “the Parties”), respectfully request that this Court temporarily stay…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Wichita Falls Office Associates v. Banc One Corporation, Banc One Corporation and Bank One, Texas, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.