Legal Opinion

Whitener v. Snyder

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 24, 2001No. 00-6380, 00-6394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eric Whitener and Cecil Jackson, pro se federal prisoners, appeal from district court orders denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The cases have been consolidated on appeal. These cases have been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1990, Whitener and Jackson were convicted of various drug-related offenses including a continuing criminal enterprise charge. Their convictions were affirmed on appeal, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Jeffers v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sherman Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Sawyer v. Carlyle Holder, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Alfred Sheffield v. Sherry BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API