Sweeney v. Vierbuchen
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStarr, C. J.
Appellees brought this action to contest the will of Anita Krueger, deceased, and to set aside the probate thereof making defendants the appellants herein. From a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees this appeal is prosecuted.
The complaint was in one paragraph and among other things alleged that appellees were the sole heirs of decedent; that the appellant executor was an attorney at law; that he drafted the will of the deceased and at that time was her attorney and confidential advisor and had been for several months prior thereto, and continued to occupy that relation until the time…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Will of PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- City of Decatur v. EadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- McMechen v. McMechenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Dudley v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Henry v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Liggett v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Neese v. BoatrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Perkins v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.