Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sacred Heart Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 8, 2008No. 26131-0-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

¶1 An employer is liable for the acts of its employees done in the scope and course of employment and therefore in furtherance of the employer’s business. An employer is also responsible for its own negligence in failing to properly supervise an employee or in failing to protect those particularly vulnerable from foreseeable harm. Here, a nursing assistant employed by a hospital contacted two psychiatric patients in his employer’s hospital. He hugged and kissed one patient and hugged another and suggested they have sex. Both patients went to the nursing assistant’s home and engaged in sexual…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kaltreider v. Lake Chelan Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Kaltreider v. LAKE CHELAN COMMUNITY HOSP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Smith v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. John & Jane Doe, Appellant's v. Phillip J. Zylstra, M.d.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Kaltreider v. Lake Chelan Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API