Legal Opinion

Lippe v. Stone Bank

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided September 16, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03043Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION NATHAN LIPPE PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 3:21-CV-03043 STONE BANK DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER Currently before the Court are Defendant Stone Bank’s Motion for Order Declaring Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted (Doc. 227) and Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 163).1 Plaintiff Nathan Lippe opposes the Bank’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment but has filed no opposition to the Motion for Order Declaring Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted. For the reasons stated below, both pending Motions are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lafayette Canada v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Hendrickson v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Hatchell v. WrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API