Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Atherton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1937No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal by the defendant is from his conviction under an indictment charging him with having begotten a female bastard child on the body of Marian Reichley, in the latter part of April, 1936. The question here involved is raised by the first assignment which charges that the trial judge erred in refusing appellant’s first point for charge, reading: “Under all the evidence, the verdict must be for the defendant on the charge of bastardy.”

Under the Commonwealth’s own evidence the point should have been affirmed. It was based upon the proposition that the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DimatteoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. GantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. BaroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API