Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 25, 1956No. 373, Docket 23972Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

I concur in the affirmance on relators’ cross appeal. As to respondent’s appeal, I dissent, for the reasons stated by Judge Dimock in his opinions reported in D.C., 123 F.Supp. 6741 and D.C., 133 F.Supp. *313850.2 I shall not repeat in detail his statement of the evidence or his reasoning. I think the record amply justifies his conclusion, 133 F.Supp. at page 852, that, “It has become so clear that the policy of the Immigration Authorities is to apply blood tests to all Chinese and to no whites that even the presumption of administrative finality will not support a determination to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API