Legal Opinion

Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Maurice

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1930No. Docket No. 5990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The defendants and appellants executed their note in the sum of $1600 in favor of the plaintiff, and secured it by the execution of a second mortgage upon certain real property in Riverside County, subject to a deed of trust to secure the repayment of $3,500. The property was conveyed to the defendant W. H. Weeks, who assumed and agreed to pay the encumbrances, but who although named as a defendant was never served with process and never appeared in the action. Upon default in the payment of the note plaintiff brought action for the recovery of the principal sum with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hihn v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DeeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Duncan v. WolferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Penick & Ford, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API