Legal Opinion

State v. BRIDENHAGER

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1971No. 871S222PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Supplement to Order of December 16, 1971

Prentice, J.

The motions and petitions ruled upon previously involved the same question, namely whether or not the attempted appeal was timely filed and is properly pending before this Court.

Plaintiffs (Appellees) obtained a summary judgment in the trial court (Superior Court of Marion County sitting En Banc as the Court of Claims), and the defendant (appellant) filed a timely motion to correct errors, which was overruled by the trial court sitting in general term on May 3, 1971. The ruling was entered in the minutes of the meeting, which were delivered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chissom v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Jolly v. MODISETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Leonard v. BroughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bailer v. DowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Raisor v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BridenhagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wadkins v. ThorntonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Basinger v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Tancos v. A.W., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Dotson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API