Legal Opinion

State v. Soriano

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1984No. 83-006CR; CA A27206; 83-006CR; CA A27207; 10-82-10659; CA A26824; 10-83-04513; CA A28513; SC S31000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We allowed review of these consolidated cases to determine the validity of ORS 136.619 in light of Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The Court of Appeals (Gillette, J.), after a careful and exhaustive analysis, concluded that, under the Oregon Constitution, only transactional immunity is permissible and that the lesser, statutory immunity of use and derivative use fails to meet the requirements of the Oregon Constitution. 68 Or App 642, 684 P2d 1220 (1984).

We have examined the initial arguments of the state to uphold the statute made before the Court of Appeals and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SorianoOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API