Legal Opinion

Clarence C. Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 15, 1961No. 16063_1PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of “forging and uttering” under 22 D.C.Code § 1401 (1951). At his own request he was tried without a jury. A motion to suppress the victim’s stolen credit card was denied and the appellant contends this was error because the search warrant which authorized search of his dwelling did not describe the credit card but only other stolen articles which were recovered in the search. 1

A police officer engaged in searching appellant’s bedroom under a warrant which described numerous articles of stolen personal property 2 opened a dresser drawer in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lonnie Robert Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Palmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Clarence C. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Michael Joseph Gurleski and Dorothy Villafranca v. United States of America, Frank Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
  3. People v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API