Legal Opinion
Paccom Leasing Corp. v. Deico Electronics, Inc. (In Re Deico Electronics, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1992No. BAP No. NC-91-2138-OAsJ, Bankruptcy No. 4-90-05518N3PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLLASON, Bankruptcy Judge:
The bankruptcy court ordered adequate protection payments commencing after the date urged by Appellant Paccom Leasing Corporation (“Paccom”). Paccom appealed and we affirm.
FACTS
Paccom twice requested relief from stay or adequate protection concerning equipment used by the debtor and necessary for its reorganization. The bankruptcy court ordered adequate protection payments of $5,000 per month pursuant to the second motion. That motion was filed on July 22, 1991, and heard on August 22, 1991. The order was filed in bankruptcy court on October 22, 1991. It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Itule v. Metlease, Inc. (In Re Itule)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Travelers Life & Annuity Co. v. Ritz-Carlton of D.C., Inc. (In Re Ritz-Carlton of D.C., Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. Craddock-Terry Shoe Corp. (In Re Craddock-Terry Shoe Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1988
3Cited by15 opinions
- First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Matter of Continental Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- In Re DupellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Bronitsky v. Bea (In Re Bea)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In Re FarmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.