Legal Opinion
State v. Kania
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1983No. Cr. 940PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
The defendant, Phillip Kania (Kania), appealed from a jury verdict finding him guilty of forgery and from an order dated 23 March 1983 extending the time for trial. Kama’s sole contention on appeal was that the charge against him was not tried within the time specified in North Dakota Century Code Ch. 29-33, the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (the Act).
The Act provides in pertinent part:
“Any person who is imprisoned in a penal or correctional institution of this state may request final disposition of any untried indictment, information, or complaint pending…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Philip A. Foley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- State v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Ekis v. DarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Donlin v. DonlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AgueroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.