Rose v. Stalcup, County Treas.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Haskell County : E. F. Lester, Judge. Action by Sam Rose against R. E. Stal-cup, County Treasurer of Haskell County, to recover tax payment made under protest. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Haskell county. The appeal involves, in substance, the following facts: On the 28th day of October, 1917, Sam Rose purchased at a public land sale, held at Stigler, Oklahoma, under rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the • Interior, certain segregated lands of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Indians, situated in Haskell county, Oklahoma, paying therefor, on the date of sale, one-fourth of the purchase price, and the balance within 15 days thereafter, and receiving from the Superintendent for the Five Civilized Tribes a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowls v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Miller v. CoreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- State v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Ware v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- County of Cass v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Oil Corp. v. Yale Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Board of County Com'rs v. Central Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Lederman v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.