Legal Opinion

Terminix International Co. v. Palmer Ranch Ltd. Partnership

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 26, 2006No. 8:04-cv-00574Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUCKLEW, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 47). Plaintiff filed a Response thereto (Doc. No. 48).

Background

Defendant filed a state court complaint against Plaintiff. Plaintiff then filed the instant petition to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 4, and alleged subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity. 1 Defendant admitted to Plaintiffs allegations regarding subject matter jurisdiction in its answer and did not otherwise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aubie BALTIN; Gwilda Baltin, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Terminix International Co. LP v. Palmer Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Love v. TurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API