Legal Opinion
United States v. David Charles Foster
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1974No. 73-3028PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Foster appeals from an order revoking his probation, contending that the evidence does not support a determination that he intentionally violated the terms of probation and that the district court’s decision to revoke was an abuse of discretion. He also contends that the manner in which the district court conducted the probation revocation hearings denied him due process.
On January 12, 1973, Foster pleaded guilty to possessing an altered $20 Federal Reserve Note with intent to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. The district court sentenced him to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,929 Theodore B. Wessel v. L. M. Buhler and N. A. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Robert Marshall, United States of America v. Dennis Eischen, United States of America v. Ronald Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ernest C. Davis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Herman L. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Birdie Louise Joshua Harris, United States of America v. Billy Charles HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Anthony SciutoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Tiitsman v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.