Legal Opinion

Zatz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 9, 1998No. Docket No. 97-4287PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners are four minority shareholders who own the 61 shares of common stock of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company (SSW) that are publicly held. In the decision we are asked to review, the Board determined that $6,800 per share was a just and reasonable price to be paid to petitioners as part of the proposed merger of SSW into SSW Merger Corp. (which was merely one stage of the larger merger of Union Pacific Corporation (UP) and Southern Pacific Rail Corporation (SP)). Petitioners challenge this *146decision on essentially three grounds: (1) that the Board lacked jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niebur v. Town of CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  2. Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2004
  3. Zatz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Erie-Niagara Rail Steering Committee v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API