Legal Opinion
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided January 9, 2004No. 2:03-cv-00097PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, Chief Judge.
Global NAPS, Inc. (“Global”) seeks review of a determination by the Vermont Public Service Board (“Public Service Board” or “Board”) requiring Global to pay access charges to Verizon New England Inc. (“Verizon”) for its long distance calls, and to cease using “virtual NXX service” (“VNXX”). All parties 1 have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, Global’s motion (Doc. 12) is denied; Verizon’s cross-motion (Doc. 17) is granted; and the individual board members’ cross-motion (Doc. 20) is denied as moot.
1. Background
A. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DSCI Corp. v. Department of Telecommunications & EnergyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- De Mejias v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005