Legal Opinion

Smith Barney Inc. v. Heiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered June 29, 1995, which granted petitioner’s application to the extent of permanently staying arbitration of any of respondent’s claims based upon the acquisition of a bond purchased prior to February 20, 1989, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition to stay the arbitration is denied.

Since the New York choice of law provision in the parties’ arbitration agreement did not explicitly provide that the agreement "and its enforcement” would be governed by New York law, and did not otherwise expressly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Goldberg v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Hamershlag, Kempner & Co. v. OestrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API