Legal Opinion
Dillon v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 7, 1954No. A-11990PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, Judge.
The plaintiff in error John G. Dillon, defendant below, was charged by information in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma, of having on July 6, 1953, violated City Ordinance Title 19, Par. 402 of the Revised Ordinances of the ■ city of Tulsa, within the city limits, to wit, carrying a concealed weapon. The defendant was tried by the court, found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $15 and judgment and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.
A motion to suppress the evidence was made and overruled of which action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Nott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- The People v. Niemoth.Illinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. City of Enid Ex Rel. Enid City CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. City of EnidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Allen v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.