Legal Opinion
Richard D. Austin v. The House of Vision, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 9, 1969No. 16864PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before us on appeal for the second time. In Austin v. House of Vision, Inc., 7 Cir., 385 F.2d 171 (1967), plaintiff Austin appealed from the dismissal of his amended complaint and the denial of his motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We concluded that plaintiff should be afforded an opportunity to further amend his complaint. Accordingly, we vacated the judgment of dismissal and remanded for this stated purpose.
On remand, the district court granted such leave and plaintiff filed his second amended complaint. On consideration thereof, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Richard D. Austin v. The House of Vision, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lucille E. ROHLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRW, INC., William N. Lesley and Ralph M. Lehman, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Van Dyke Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Graham v. Hudgins, Thompson, Ball & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Patrick Edwin Golden, Jr. v. Kentile Floors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.