Legal Opinion
Wildman v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided December 22, 2016No. 5:16-CV-663-DAEPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
DAVID ALAN EZRA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Medtronic”) on October 14, 2016. (Dkt. # 18.) Ray Wildman (“Plaintiff’ or “Wildman”) filed a Response in opposition (Dkt. #23), and Defendants filed a Reply (Dkt. # 25). Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing.
After careful consideration of the memo-randa filed in support of and in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.