Legal Opinion

Troy Boiler Works, Inc. v. Sterile Technologies, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph R. Cannizzaro, J.

*1007Plaintiff, Troy Boiler Works, Incorporated, commenced this action to obtain the purchase price of goods sold and delivered to defendant, Sterile Technologies, Inc. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint against it with prejudice on grounds that the action is barred by the statute of limitations contained in section 2-725 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

As an initial matter, plaintiff contended that because defendant served his answer and then made the motion to dismiss, the motion was not timely pursuant to CPLR 3211…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sesow v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Greer Limestone Co. v. NestorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McLeod v. CowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Reiss v. Pacific Steel Pool Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Eurogen, Inc. v. CensorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alpacas of America, LLC v. GroomeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. MDC S.p.A v. ShumanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API