Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1971No. 7118SC104PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROOK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for nonsuit. Defendant argues that to withstand motion for nonsuit the evidence must disclose not only that the fingerprints were found at the place where the crime was committed, but also the fingerprints must be shown to have been left only at the time of the crime’s commission. Defendant cites State v. Minton, 228 N.C. 518, 46 S.E. 2d 296, in support of this argument.

In Minton the State’s evidence disclosed that the premises of Coastal Lunch were broken or entered by breaking out the glass which made up the top half of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CichySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. DorsettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API