State v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The sole question argued in defendant’s brief and presented by this appeal concerns the denial of his motions for nonsuit. He contends that the evidence in this case was entirely circumstantial and was insufficient to support the verdict, relying on State v. Minton, 228 N.C. 518, 46 S.E. 2d 296. It is elementary that upon motion for nonsuit in a criminal case the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State and that the motion should be denied if, when the evidence is so viewed, the court determines that there is substantial evidence to warrant a jury finding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BurrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975