Legal Opinion
Barnard v. Sutliff
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1992No. 900241Published
1Opinion of the Court
846 P.2d 1229 (1992)
Brian M. BARNARD, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Toni M. SUTLIFF and Utah State Bar, Defendants and Appellees.
No. 900241.
Supreme Court of Utah.
December 18, 1992.
John Pace, Brian M. Barnard, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.
Carman E. Kipp, Robert H. Rees, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellees.
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Brian M. Barnard appeals from a district court order and judgment finding that he violated rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and imposing a sanction of $4,381. The Third District Court found that Barnard had failed to research its jurisdiction…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.