Acacia Media Technologies Corp. v. New Destiny Internet Group
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FURTHER CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER; ORDER FINDING CLAIMS TERMS INDEFINITE AND CLAIMS INVALID
WARE, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
In its July 12, 2004 Claim Construction Order, the Court reached a tentative conclusion that the term “sequence encoder” as used in claims 1, 7, 17, 18, 32 and 33 of the ’702 patent is indefinite. This tentative conclusion of indefiniteness was based on the Court’s findings from the intrinsic evidence that the term: (a) is never used in the written description; (b) does not appear in the drawings; (c) has no plain meaning, and (d) cannot be inferred to be a “time…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PalmTop Productions, Inc. v. LO-Q PLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- LBT IP II LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021