Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kathy Thomas, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin Duane Thomas, Deceased v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1985No. 84-5472Published

1ConcurrenceWellford, Circuit Judge

I believe that the only proper basis for jurisdiction in this case was based upon a federal question, not diversity, for the reasons and on the basis of the authority herein indicated. If this were properly deemed a diversity case, however, I am in substantial agreement with Judge Edwards’ conclusions set out in his opinion.

First, if the rules of diversity applied in this case, Kentucky law would be applicable. Erie Railroad v. Thompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). *372I agree further that TVA exercised reasonable care under the circumstances. TVA’s instructions given to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gustof Charles Feyers and Gabrielle Feyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API