Kathy Thomas, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin Duane Thomas, Deceased v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1ConcurrenceWellford, Circuit Judge
I believe that the only proper basis for jurisdiction in this case was based upon a federal question, not diversity, for the reasons and on the basis of the authority herein indicated. If this were properly deemed a diversity case, however, I am in substantial agreement with Judge Edwards’ conclusions set out in his opinion.
First, if the rules of diversity applied in this case, Kentucky law would be applicable. Erie Railroad v. Thompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). *372I agree further that TVA exercised reasonable care under the circumstances. TVA’s instructions given to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gustof Charles Feyers and Gabrielle Feyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.