Legal Opinion

Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Ctr.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1997No. 1995-0131PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 284.] ESTATES OF MORGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FAIRFIELD FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER ET AL., APPELLEES; BROWN, APPELLANT. [Cite as Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Ctr.,

1997-Ohio-194.] Psychotherapists—Malpractice—Negligence—Outpatient kills his parents— Relationship between psychotherapist and patient in an outpatient setting constitutes a special relation justifying the imposition of a duty upon the psychotherapist to protect against and/or control the patient’s violent propensities. 1. Generally, a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Biddle v. Warren Gen. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Carole Kuligoski, Individually and On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, and Mark Kuligoski and James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat and Northeast Kingdom Human ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Amoako-Okyere v. Church of the Messiah United Methodist ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API