Legal Opinion

Meinecke v. Skaggs

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1949No. 8917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

Plaintiff’s complaint in this action consisted of two causes of action. The first was based upon her alleged wrongful arrest and detention. The second upon slander, consisting of the wrongful accusation of having stolen an article of merchandise from the store operated by defendants.

Defendants’ motion for nonsuit was sustained as to the first cause of action but denied as to the second.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants on the second cause of action.

Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied and she has appealed from the judgment.

She predicates error…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. BillupsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Ford v. DrakeMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kroeger v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Tennant v. F. C. Whitney & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wollan v. LordMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Miller v. BelknapIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gunderson v. BrewsterMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McGee v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API