Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Billups

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

In her original petition Mrs. Maggie Billups sue the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company for slander. In her amended petition she sought damages for false arrest and imprisonment. From a verdict and judgment in her favor for $500, the company appeals.

The failure of the court to sustain appellant’s motion for a peremptory instruction is the only ground relied on for a reversal.

The facts are: Appellant operated a chain store in Louisa. William Harold Moody was the local manager, and Luther Haywood was the only clerk regularly employed. Miss Gladys…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Johnson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Gariety v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Russell v. LevinsohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Banks v. FritschCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. J. J. Newberry Co. v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. National Bond & Investment Co. v. WhithornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API