Legal Opinion

Tishman & Lipp, Inc. v. Delta Airlines

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 25, 1967No. 64 Civ. 2751PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POLLACK, District Judge.

At the close of the plaintiff’s case tried to the court and a jury, and again at the close of the entire case, the defendant moved for a directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for a dismissal of the complaint; or, in the alternative, that judgment be entered against it for $50.00 on the ground that as a matter of law it is in no event liable to the plaintiff beyond that amount. The substance of the action was for recovery of the value of jewelry contained in a jewelry sample case which had been lost. Being of the opinion…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. B.F. Goodrich Company v. United States Filter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Tishman & Lipp, Inc. v. Delta Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Blair v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  4. Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Emery Air Freight Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API