State v. Di Frisco
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
118 N.J. 253 (1990)
571 A.2d 914
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY DI FRISCO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 9, 1989.
Decided March 12, 1990.
George T. Taite argued the cause for appellant (Samuel R. De Luca, attorney; Samuel R. De Luca and George T. Taite, on the brief).
Hilary L. Brunell, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Herbert H. Tate, Jr., Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).
Catherine A. Foddai, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause on behalf of amicus curiae, Attorney General of New Jersey (Peter N. Perretti, Jr.,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler.
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.