Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1965No. Appeal, No. 18Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen :

In Gianfelice Unemployment Compensation Case, 396 Pa. 545, 153 A. 2d 906 (1959) Ave said: “[T]he collective bargaining agreement should not control in determining the eligibility of a retired employee for unemployment compensation; rather, the factual matrix at the time of separation should govern”. (Emphasis in the original.)

We gave two specific reasons for outlawing consideration of the collective bargaining agreement in determining whether termination of employment was voluntary: (1) “The pressures of the collective bargaining process are too complex…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API