Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Grinnell Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 17, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Chester Ladd petitions from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his petition for restoration. The Hearing Officer concluded that the employee’s unwillingness to cross a union picket line could not, as a matter of law, constitute “good and reasonable cause” for a refusal of an offer of post-injury employment pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 214(1) (Supp.1998). We disagree, and remand for a determination of the reasonableness of Ladd’s refusal in light of the facts specific to this case.

[¶ 2] Ladd is a thirty-year member of a national Sprinkler Fitters’ Union. Ladd suffered a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loud v. Kezar Falls Woolen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Thompson v. Earle W. Noyes & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API