Legal Opinion

Mott v. Fiske

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1900No. 18,736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— This action was brought December 31, 1895, for partition of the real estate described in the complaint. It was alleged that appellant was the owner of the undivided two thirds of said real estate, and appellees, Alfred V. C. Johnson and Grace Johnson were the owners of the undivided one-third thereof, and that the other appellees claim an interest in or lien on said real estate, the nature of which is unknown to appellant, and they &re made parties to answer as to their interest.

All who were defendants at the trial were defaulted, except appellees, Fiske and Beem, who filed an answer. W. A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hamilton v. ByramIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Huffman v. ForemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. White v. RedenbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Langford v. De ArmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. McClelland v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API