Legal Opinion

Langford v. De Armond

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1965No. 20,113PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an action instituted in the Madison Circuit Court by the appellants against the appellees to quiet title to real estate against the appellees’ tax title deed.

The appeal was originally filed in the Supreme Court of Indiana for the reason that the appellants were questioning the constitutionality of §4, Ch. 224 of the Acts of 1941. This section in substance provided that no action to contest the validity of any tax title deed shall be brought after the expiration of *441one year from the date of execution of said deed. Because said statute was repealed by the Acts of 196S, ch. 280, §1002/…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Gradison v. LoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Mott v. FiskeIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. 88.28 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Porter County, State of Indiana, Appeal of Mary W. CrumpackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. Central Indiana Railroad v. MikesellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Langford v. Anderson Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Harold T. Long and Wanda E. Long v. Hubert AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Crumpacker v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API