Legal Opinion
State v. Bectsa
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 30, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On error to Morris Oyer and Terminer.
1Opinion of the Court
*323The opinion, of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
When this indictment was moved, counsel for defendant objected to proceeding with the trial for a reason that appears in the following extract from the printed case certified to this court with this writ of error:
“The prosecutor moved the indictment.
“Defendant objects to proceeding with the trial of this cause at the present time, because the defendant has not been served with a panel of forty-eight names of men eligible for jury duty and thereby offers to prove that there are on the panel returned to try the defendant at least two men…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WorlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- State v. FlathersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- State v. LeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.