Norwood v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BOYDSTON, Presiding Judge.
Insuror appeals, from a 29 percent permanent partial disability award on the grounds it is excessive and conflicts with AMA Guidelines. We affirm.
I
Jurisdictional facts are undisputed. This appeal involves only the interpretation of the medical evidence which consists of the deposition and reports by Dr. A. for Claimant, Dr. F. for Insuror and the report of court-appointed Dr. P. Claimant’s injury is to his shoulder and cervical spine.
Dr. F. rated Claimant’s permanent partial disability at zero. Dr. A. rated the injuries at 35 percent to the body in the following…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Tidal Oil Co. v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murray v. D & J Motor Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Wheat v. Heritage ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. EvansCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Threlkeld v. Lee Way Motor FreightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989