Legal Opinion

Joseph McQuirter, et al. v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 30, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01724Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH MCQUIRTER, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01724-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (Doc. No. 34) 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 19 34.) The pending motion was taken under submission on April 21, 2025. (Doc. No. 41.) For the 20 reasons explained below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted. 21…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API