Legal Opinion

Opheim v. Standard Ins. Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided January 9, 2018No. C 16–4145–MWBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ...849 *849A. Factual Background ...849

B. Procedural Background ...852

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS ...853

A. Opheim's Claims ...853

1. Opheim's denial of benefits claim ...853

a. Arguments of the parties ...853

b. Applicable standards ...854

i. Standard of review ...854

ii. The "plan documents rule" ...854

c. Analysis ...856

2. Opheim's equitable relief claim ...858

3. Attorney fees ...858

a. Arguments of the parties ...858

b. Applicable standards ...859

c. Analysis ...859

B. Standard's Third-Party Claim ...860

1. Standard's claim for a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API