People v. Bastidas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Notwithstanding that defendant’s earlier statement was given without Miranda warnings, his later statement made after such warnings cannot be said, as a matter of law, to have been given in violation of his right against compulsory self-incrimination. This follows from the findings of the Trial Judge, supported by the record and undisturbed by the Appellate Division, and, therefore, beyond our power of review, that defendant voluntarily accompanied the detective to the station house; that he was left…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. LaiettaNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. NovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fagon v. BaraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- People v. DeversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.