Horowitz v. Sherman
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : ROBERT HOROWITZ, et al. : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 19-2459 : BRUCE SHERMAN, et al. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending and ready for resolution in this challenge to a collections action is the motion for leave to amend filed by pro se Plaintiffs Cathy and Robert Horowitz (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). The issues have been briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion for leave to amend will be denied in part and granted in part. I. Background In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Simmons v. United Mortgage & Loan Investment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.