Legal Opinion
In Re Guardianship of Maunz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1991No. 15-90-10PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Van Wert County, Probate Division, ordering the surcharge of a former guardian for the benefit of the guardianship account.
In February 1978, Karl Maunz (“appellant”) was appointed guardian of his minor son, Bradley Maunz. The purpose of the guardianship was to receive and hold $4,500 in settlement proceeds from an action for personal injuries suffered by the ward. Throughout the existence of the guardianship, appellant made no filings or accounting with the probate court.
On September 9, 1985, the ward attained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moldovan v. Cuyahoga County Welfare DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Stewart v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Bosco v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bellaire City Schools Board of Education v. PaxtonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Pewter Mug, Inc. v. M. U. G. Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Guardianship of SkrzynieckiOhio Court of Appeals · 1997