Commonwealth Telephone Co. v. Carley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff, a Wisconsin corporation engaged in furnishing telephone service in the city and town of Dodgeville, in Iowa county, pursuant to an indeterminate permit from the state, for the purpose of enjoining the defendants from operating a telephone exchange, for the reason that jhe operation of such exchange constitutes a violation of the anti-duplication provisions of sec. 196.50 of the Statutes.
It is conceded that the defendants at no time applied to the railroad commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. In defendants’ answer it is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calumet Service Co. v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Fogelsville & Trexlertown Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- State ex rel. M. O. Danciger & Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- State ex rel. City of Superior v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Frank A. Graham Ice Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Weyauwega Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Hotel Pfister, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. City Bank & Trust Co. v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.