Legal Opinion

Leo v. Pearce Stores Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 15, 1931No. 407PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is the usual equity receivership suit upon a creditor’s bill brought by the plaintiff, as a creditor of the Pearce Stores Company, a Michigan corporation, on behalf of all of its creditors, against the defendant corporation, for conservation, marshaling, and distribution. The proceedings herein now before the court arise from the filing and hearing of various claims against the defendant pursuant to the orders of this court, to which claims the receiver interposed objeetionsEvidence has been presented relative to certain of' these claims, and numerous briefs have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  3. William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. In re Mullings Clothing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. State v. United States Steel Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Buhl Land Co. v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1954
  4. Leo v. Pearce Stores Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1932
  5. Quinn v. JaloffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API